The Washington Post asks
QUOTE
Traffic-choked streets are a part of daily life in the Washington region. In recent years, bicycles have become an ever-more present part of life on those streets too, as more adults turn to bikes for transportation, fitness and pleasure. How well are cyclists and drivers sharing the road? Send us your thoughts and observations. E-mail transportation@washpost.com.
END QUOTE
You want thoughts? Here's a thought: DONT KILL ME!
When a bike and a car get into a collision - the biker ALWAYS loses. Period. End of Story. End of Life.
Any car driver who thinks a biker is on a suicide mission to kill themselves is NUTS.
We tried to pass a three foot rule in VA and failed. 3 FEET. That's all I ask - enough room for your bumper or review view not to knock me over. But no - cars WILL NOT give bikes enough room on the road.
I sit at traffic lights in DC now and watch the light turn. Green. Yellow. Red. And then count the two cars that run the red light. Red light runners kill people.
Any while I am ranting, why does EVERY story about a bike and car accident end with these two lines: (1) "No charges are pending." and (2) "An investigation is taking place as to why the bike hit the car." When cars kill car drivers - when cars kill pedestrians, there is an investigation. There is a presumption that something went wrong. But when a car kills a biker - the biker must have run into the car.
Okay, here are my thoughts
* Law and culture has to change so that bikes are given enough room to navigate safely on the road.
* Implement the Idaho stop rule for bikes.
* Rules designed for cars should not apply to bikes. I AM NOT SAYING RULES SHOULD NOT APPLY TO BIKES. I am saying car rules should not apply. In Arlington as traffic calming planning, there are stop signs everywhere. On a bike, I come to a stop sign designed to slow cars down - I can see all ways, I can see that it is safe, I proceed. The policy behind the signs - to slow down cars - makes no sense and is even counter productive when applied to bikes. We need BIKE rules for bikes - not CAR rules for bikes. Yes, bikes must move safely. Absolutely. But dont apply rules for a 1 ton, 60 MPH hunk of steel to a small footprint, much slower moving, much safer vehicle.
* Share the road means "share the road." It does not mean that bikes are aliens that are tolerated and then shoved off when the single person in a car driver is late for their tennis match.
* Bike lanes right next to park cars are a stupid idea. It is an invitation to be doored.
* Major bike paths need to be wide enough to support major traffic. Single lanes under bridges is an invitation for an accident.
* Develop a culture of responsible bikers. Sounds when passing. Lights. Day gloo colors. Safe biking. WABA does a great job.
Being on the road is a clear "US" against "THEM" experience. The cars view themselves as US and the bikers as THEM. The bikers are not tolerated. They are honked at, pushed off the road, and killed. This has to change.
Bikers are paying taxes just like everyone else. The same or similar level of those tax dollars should go to support bike commuting as car commuting. Bike commuting has got to be a great bang for the tax dollar buck - given the amount of maintenance and repair car roads and bridges need as opposed to bike paths and sidewalks.
Transportation by single occupancy 1 ton hunks of gas guzzling steel is no longer viable. As was said about the Valdez accident, and now the oil spill in the Gulf, "It was not the Captain of Valdez's driving that caused that oil spill - it was our driving that caused it." The era of gasoline based single occupancy 20 MPG commuting is over. Biking is part of the solution. Infrastructure, law, and culture has to change to support this - and to end the unquestioned killing of bikers by motor vehicles.
Robert Cannon
Arlington, VA